Coritiba FC and the Power Play in Brazilian Football Governance

In a bold move that has sent ripples through the corridors of Brazilian football, Coritiba FC has joined forces with nineteen other prominent clubs in a boycott of the upcoming Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) election. The announcement, made on May 29, 2025, underscores a growing discontent among the clubs regarding the governance practices of the CBF, particularly following the abrupt blockage of Reinaldo Carneiro Bastos, the president of the São Paulo Football Federation, from candidacy. This move by Coritiba and its allies is more than a mere protest; it is a clarion call for change in how football is administered in Brazil.

The decision to boycott the election is not without its complexities. Despite their physical absence, the CBF has permitted remote voting, thereby allowing these clubs to potentially influence the outcome without being present. This development highlights the evolving nature of football governance, where traditional power structures are increasingly being challenged by new dynamics, influenced by both modern technology and a collective desire for transparency and fairness.

Coritiba's involvement in this boycott is significant. The club has long been a staple of Brazilian football, renowned for its rich history and passionate fanbase. This stance aligns with the broader sentiment among clubs that the current governance model is in dire need of reform. The sole candidate remaining in the election, Samir Xaud, head of the Roraima Football Federation, has the backing of 25 state federations, presenting a united front against the dissenting clubs. However, the absence of these major clubs in the election process casts a shadow over the legitimacy of the proceedings and raises questions about the future trajectory of the CBF.

The media coverage of this event has been extensive, reflecting the widespread interest and concern regarding the governance of Brazilian football. The situation is emblematic of a larger struggle between entrenched interests and emergent voices advocating for change. As the story continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether this boycott will catalyze the desired reforms or merely serve as another chapter in the ongoing saga of Brazilian football politics.